Detecting and Treating Poor Night Vision
Helping patients who are experiencing decreased contrast sensitivity and night-vision problems.
BY STEVE SILVERSTEIN, M.D., F.A.C.S.
A 48-year-old cross-country truck driver presents to clinic with a history of declining vision, particularly while driving after dark. His examination reveals moderate posterior subcapsular cataracts, with a BCVA of 20/40 OD, and 20/60 OS. Cataract extraction is recommended, and discussion centers on the best choice in IOL technology, considering his age and his career/social activities.
When a patient presents with complaints of night-vision problems, the first responsibility of the clinician is to determine whether there is an anatomic or physiologic cause for the patient's subjective complaints. Whether it's objective and documentable, or subjective via patient complaint, poor night vision can be divided into two principal categories: an anatomic or physiologic disease process, or caused by something done to or on behalf of the eye that has a potentially negative impact on contrast sensitivity and night driving.
While poor night vision is most notably associated with physiologic conditions, including, for example, retinitis pigmentosa, rod-cone dystrophy or cone-rod dystrophy and a variety of esoteric conditions, this article will focus on the natural effects of aging and iatrogenic causes of decreased contrast sensitivity and/or night vision.
Use of a brightness acuity tester (BAT) is one reliable measure of patient's subjective complaints. If the clinician has the equipment to perform this test, contrast sensitivity is an indicator that may further shed light on a patient's symptoms.
The Aging Process
It has been well reported for decades that the aging process causes anatomic changes to the retinal pigment epithelium as well as changes to the cornea, including ocular surface and tear film abnormalities, changes in collagen matrices, changes to the natural crystalline lens, significant vitreous floaters, the potential for epiretinal membrane formation and/or macular pucker. Each of these occurs naturally, and has been shown to reduce contrast sensitivity and/or worsen patient symptoms of night vision performance.
The most common and obvious cause of these symptoms is cataracts. Nighttime driving issues or glare often precede changes in visual acuity. Oftentimes, it is the glare and decreased night driving that brings patients in for initial evaluation.
Front to Back
Practitioners should start with the front of the eye and work their way back as to the potential source of the complaint. Begin with the ocular surface. If the patient has tear insufficiency or ocular surface disease, artificial lubricants, treatment of meibomitis and blepharitis, as well as other causes of ocular surface disease must be addressed in order to maximize ocular surface health. You should look for corneal pathology including basement membrane dystrophy, scarring, punctuate keratitis or topographic irregularity. Then, examine the lens, which is the most frequent culprit. If a patient has a visually significant cataract, surgical options should be discussed.
Posteriorly, the vitreous may be a contributing factor, as some patients are plagued with a greater-than-average number of vitreous floaters, which interfere with their central acuity. These are caused by condensations forming in the vitreous gel, pigment that flecks off the retina or the sequelae of a posterior vitreous detachment. To a lesser degree, significant asteroid hyalosis can play a role, but usually the patient is unaware of this condition.
Glaucoma can cause night vision problems, particularly when peripheral vision is constricted. As a result, patients use less of the information presented to them, and images may appear darker. Retinal pathology in the form of epiretinal membrane, macular pucker, retinal drusen, scarring, macular edema (from any cause — diabetes, post-cataract surgery, etc), retinal pigment epithelial detachment and central serous maculopathy are some of the most common pathologies that may cause night vision abnormalities.
Iatrogenic Etiologies
LASIK has long been known to decrease contrast sensitivity, and sometimes, particularly with high myopes, have a negative effect on night vision. Custom wavefront procedures with less tissue removal and a more blended peripheral zone have decreased, but not eliminated, these issues.
Routine cataract surgery with a monofocal implant in either patients at greater risk, or in low-risk uncomplicated cataract patients, may develop increased macular thickening or clinical/subclinical macular edema, each of which may negatively impact night vision and/or contrast sensitivity.
The routine use of an NSAID medicine preoperatively and postoperatively is essential to lowering the risk of macular thickening and/or macular edema.
John Wittpenn, M.D., (the author) and I, along with several other doctors, participated in the Acular LS for Cystoid Macular Edema (ACME) study, which is a randomized, masked comparison of topical ketorolac 0.4% plus steroid versus steroid alone in low-risk cataract surgery patients. This study suggests that adding perioperative ketorolac to postoperative prednisolone significantly reduces the incidences of CME and macular thickening in cataract surgery patients already at low risk for this condition.1 This study further taught us that even a very small amount of macular thickening (10-20 μm) correlates with a decrease in contrast sensitivity. Numerous other studies also demonstrate the use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory in conjunction with topical steroids reduce the risk of macular thickening and/or clinical or subclinical macular edema compared to those treated with steroids alone.
Finally, it is clear that premium IOLs, particularly multifocal IOLs, cause a decrease in contrast sensitivity and have a negative effect upon nighttime activities, such as driving. Multifocal lens implants, either refractive, diffractive or apodized, all impact contrast sensitivity. Usually the benefits of the lens far outweigh this mild decrease in contrast sensitivity, but it also suggests that it is particularly important to treat these patients with a steroid as well as a nonsteroidal to minimize the contribution caused by macular thickening at the time of surgery.
You need to know when you should avoid a multifocal lens implant. Patients who already have macular compromise, such as those with a previous history of retinal or epiretinal surgery, should not receive a multifocal IOL, but may be good candidates for a pseudo-accommodating lens implant because there is little to no decrease in contrast sensitivity with this technology.
A discussion with patients prior to surgery regarding these possible side effects is extremely important, as well as careful monitoring and reassurance postoperatively during the neuro-adaptation process. OM
Reference
1. Wittpenn J, Silverstein S, et al. A Randomized, Masked Comparison of Topical Ketorolac 0.4% Plus Steroid vs Steroid Alone in Low-Risk Cataract Surgery Patients. AJO, 146:(4):554-560.
| Steven M. Silverstein, M.D., F.A.C.S., is a partner in Silverstein Eye Centers, P.C., in Kansas City, Mo. He is also clinical professor of ophthalmology at the University of Missouri Kansas City Medical School and clinical professor of ophthalmology at the University of Health Sciences. He can be reached via e-mail at ssilverstein@silversteineyecenters.com |
|







