Objective:

The article examines the objective, findings, and clinical context described in Helping Surgeons Transition to CAIRS.

Approach:

• Course focus: The course addressed how to begin CAIRS, including patient selection, initial case planning, operating-room organization, tissue sourcing, and available tissue types.
• Techniques and planning: Faculty discussed femtosecond-dissected and manually created channels, segment customization and nomograms, and segment preparation using femtosecond cuts or double-bladed trephines.

Key Findings:

• CAIRS was described as a biological alternative to synthetic intracorneal ring segments and as an increasingly popular option for keratoconus, though not yet a universal first-line treatment.
• The course aimed to make the range of technical and planning choices easier for corneal and refractive surgeons to navigate.
• Manual channel dissection was presented as an option for surgeons without access to a femtosecond laser.

Interpretation:

Soosan Jacob said the course was developed in response to surgeons seeking practical guidance for starting CAIRS and managing its learning curve.

Limitations:

• The source is an interview describing an instructional course; it does not report clinical study methods or patient outcome data.

Conclusion:

The course covered practical pathways for surgeons transitioning to CAIRS, including both laser-assisted and manual techniques.

Sources:

• Article context provided by the user